RadarOnze
PTEN
≡

Chelsea vs Ipswich: statistics and analysis

PREMIER LEAGUE 2026/27 · PRE-MATCH ANALYSIS

Round 26

· LONDON TIME · Stamford Bridge · Referee: not provided

Chelsea

Chelsea

10 · 7 pts · 5 P · 2 W · 1 D · 2 L · GD -2

VSIpswich

Ipswich

11 · 6 pts · 5 P · 2 W · 0 D · 3 L · GD -4

Statistical engine · radaronze-v1

RadarOnze analysis

Probabilities calculated in advance. The explanatory layer organises existing factors and does not change the model’s numbers.

View in the Betting Centre

Away team to score 1+ goals

73.5%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Signal consensus: 46.2

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Away team to score 1+ goals has a model probability of 73.5%, low confidence and a sample of 5 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.76 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 4.5 yellow cards

44.4%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — metric: 3.92

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.14 × 2.24

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 68.2

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 96.7%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected metric: 4.38

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 98.1

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 4.5 yellow cards has a model probability of 44.4%, low confidence and a sample of 5 matches per team.

League average — metric: 3.92 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.14 × 2.24 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Double chance 1X

67.0%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 99.1

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Double chance 1X has a model probability of 67.0%, low confidence and a sample of 5 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.76 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Double chance X2

56.6%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 99.6

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Double chance X2 has a model probability of 56.6%, low confidence and a sample of 5 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.76 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 20.5 shots

87.7%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — shots: 25.57

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 15.07 × 11.37

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 85.2

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected shots: 26.44

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 97.7

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 20.5 shots has a model probability of 87.7%, low confidence and a sample of 5 matches per team.

League average — shots: 25.57 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 15.07 × 11.37 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Result probabilities — 1X2Complementary statistical view. It does not take part in top signals or tickets.

Away win

33.0%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 99.1

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Draw

23.6%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 99.2

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Home win

43.4%

low
View full analysis
Sample
5 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.76

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 1.76 × 1.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1490 × 1493

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 60.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 43 / 5

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: not used

    Coverage or sample was insufficient before this fixture.

  • Model expected goals: 1.76 × 1.49

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 99.6

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

18+ · Statistical estimates, not guaranteed outcomes. Bet responsibly.

Data interpretation

RadarOnze analysis

An original, deterministic reading of the real samples shown on this page.

Across 5 recent matches, Chelsea recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats and averaged 2.00 goals scored per match. Ipswich's 5-match sample contains 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 defeats, with 1.40 goals scored per match.

The venue split shows Chelsea at home with 1 win, 1 draw and 0 defeats in 2 matches, averaging 3.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded. Away from home, Ipswich has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 defeats in 3 matches, with 1.67 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded.

Both teams scored in 4 of 5 matches (80%) of Chelsea's sample and 3 of 5 matches (60%) of Ipswich's. Over 2.5 goals occurred in 5 of 5 matches (100%) and 3 of 5 matches (60%), respectively.

Shot volume separates the sides at 14.40 per match for Chelsea and 11.60 for Ipswich. On target, the averages are 5.20 and 4.60, respectively.

Historical frequencies describe the available sample; they are not a promise or certainty about a future result.

Form

Recent form and season

Last 5

Chelsea

5 matches
LDLWW
W
2
D
1
L
2
GF
10
GA
12

Last 5

Ipswich

5 matches
LWLLW
W
2
D
0
L
3
GF
7
GA
11

Last 5

Chelsea

5 matches
LDLWW
W
2
D
1
L
2
GF
10
GA
12

Last 5

Ipswich

5 matches
LWLLW
W
2
D
0
L
3
GF
7
GA
11

Last 5

Chelsea

5 matches
LDLWW
W
2
D
1
L
2
GF
10
GA
12

Last 5

Ipswich

5 matches
LWLLW
W
2
D
0
L
3
GF
7
GA
11

Season

Chelsea

5 matches
LDLWW
W
2
D
1
L
2
GF
10
GA
12

Season

Ipswich

5 matches
LWLLW
W
2
D
0
L
3
GF
7
GA
11

Goals

Frequencies across the last 10

Average goals scored

Chelsea

2.00 · 5 matches

Ipswich

1.40 · 5 matches

Average goals conceded

Chelsea

2.40 · 5 matches

Ipswich

2.20 · 5 matches

Over 0.5

Chelsea

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Ipswich

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Over 1.5

Chelsea

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Ipswich

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Over 2.5

Chelsea

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Ipswich

60% · 3 of 5 matches

Over 3.5

Chelsea

60% · 3 of 5 matches

Ipswich

40% · 2 of 5 matches

Both teams scored

Chelsea

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Ipswich

60% · 3 of 5 matches

Clean sheet

Chelsea

0% · 0 of 5 matches

Ipswich

0% · 0 of 5 matches

Failed to score

Chelsea

20% · 1 of 5 matches

Ipswich

40% · 2 of 5 matches

Corners

Volume and observed lines

Average for

Chelsea

6.80 · 5 matches

Ipswich

3.60 · 5 matches

Average against

Chelsea

5.20 · 5 matches

Ipswich

5.20 · 5 matches

Total average

Chelsea

12.00 · 5 matches

Ipswich

8.80 · 5 matches

Over 7.5

Chelsea

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Ipswich

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Over 8.5

Chelsea

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Ipswich

40% · 2 of 5 matches

Over 9.5

Chelsea

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Ipswich

20% · 1 of 5 matches

Over 10.5

Chelsea

60% · 3 of 5 matches

Ipswich

20% · 1 of 5 matches

Over 11.5

Chelsea

40% · 2 of 5 matches

Ipswich

20% · 1 of 5 matches

Cards

Averages and frequencies

Team average

Chelsea

1.80 · 5 matches

Ipswich

1.80 · 5 matches

Opponent average

Chelsea

2.80 · 5 matches

Ipswich

2.20 · 5 matches

Total average

Chelsea

4.60 · 5 matches

Ipswich

4.00 · 5 matches

Over 2.5

Chelsea

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Ipswich

100% · 5 of 5 matches

Over 3.5

Chelsea

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Ipswich

80% · 4 of 5 matches

Over 4.5

Chelsea

60% · 3 of 5 matches

Ipswich

20% · 1 of 5 matches

Over 5.5

Chelsea

40% · 2 of 5 matches

Ipswich

0% · 0 of 5 matches

Fouls

Match intensity

Committed average

Chelsea

8.60 · 5 matches

Ipswich

11.60 · 5 matches

Opponent average

Chelsea

11.80 · 5 matches

Ipswich

9.20 · 5 matches

Total average

Chelsea

20.40 · 5 matches

Ipswich

20.80 · 5 matches

Shots

Production and concessions

Average shots

Chelsea

14.40 · 5 matches

Ipswich

11.60 · 5 matches

Average shots on target

Chelsea

5.20 · 5 matches

Ipswich

4.60 · 5 matches

Average shots conceded

Chelsea

14.40 · 5 matches

Ipswich

17.20 · 5 matches

Average shots on target conceded

Chelsea

6.40 · 5 matches

Ipswich

5.80 · 5 matches

Average xG

Chelsea

2.61 · 2 matches

Ipswich

1.90 · 2 matches

Average xG against

Chelsea

1.45 · 2 matches

Ipswich

2.62 · 2 matches

Home vs away

Chelsea at home × Ipswich away

Chelsea at home

Chelsea

2 matches
DW
W
1
D
1
L
0
GF
6
GA
5

Ipswich away

Ipswich

3 matches
LWL
W
1
D
0
L
2
GF
5
GA
8
Average goals scored

Chelsea at home

3.00 · 2 matches

Ipswich away

1.67 · 3 matches

Average goals conceded

Chelsea at home

2.50 · 2 matches

Ipswich away

2.67 · 3 matches

Over 0.5

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

100% · 3 of 3 matches

Over 1.5

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

67% · 2 of 3 matches

Over 2.5

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

67% · 2 of 3 matches

Over 3.5

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

67% · 2 of 3 matches

Both teams scored

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

67% · 2 of 3 matches

Clean sheet

Chelsea at home

0% · 0 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

0% · 0 of 3 matches

Failed to score

Chelsea at home

0% · 0 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

33% · 1 of 3 matches

Total corner average

Chelsea at home

13.00 · 2 matches

Ipswich away

9.67 · 3 matches

Over 8.5 corners

Chelsea at home

100% · 2 of 2 matches

Ipswich away

67% · 2 of 3 matches

Total card average

Chelsea at home

5.00 · 2 matches

Ipswich away

4.33 · 3 matches

Players and goalkeepers

Pre-match highlights

Chelsea

João Pedro

Forward

7.53

4 matches · 360 min

3 goals · 3 assists · 4 of 8 shots on target

M. Rogers

Midfielder

7.55

5 matches · 439 min

3 goals · 1 assists · 5 of 11 shots on target

C. Palmer

Midfielder

7.42

5 matches · 443 min

2 goals · 2 assists · 5 of 14 shots on target

J. Hato

Centre-back

5.26

5 matches · 260 min

0 goals · 2 assists · 0 of 0 shots on target

Pedro Neto

Midfielder

6.88

5 matches · 336 min

1 goals · 0 assists · 4 of 7 shots on target

E. Martínez

Goalkeeper

6.72

4 matches · 360 min

18 saves · 3 goals conceded

M. Penders

Goalkeeper

0.00

3 matches · 0 min

0 saves · 0 goals conceded

Ipswich

Emersonn

Forward

7.11

5 matches · 321 min

2 goals · 1 assists · 4 of 9 shots on target

L. Davis

Centre-back

6.47

5 matches · 458 min

2 goals · 1 assists · 3 of 6 shots on target

J. Enciso

Midfielder

6.73

5 matches · 423 min

0 goals · 2 assists · 4 of 16 shots on target

Z. Flemming

Forward

6.91

3 matches · 60 min

1 goals · 0 assists · 3 of 5 shots on target

J. Clarke

Forward

6.68

4 matches · 172 min

1 goals · 0 assists · 2 of 4 shots on target

K. Scherpen

Goalkeeper

5.64

5 matches · 368 min

16 saves · 6 goals conceded

C. Walton

Goalkeeper

1.90

3 matches · 90 min

1 saves · 0 goals conceded

H2H

Recent meetings

Insufficient data

Combined view

Data convergences

  • Both scopes show a high frequency of the home team scoring.
  • Recent histories converge towards matches with three or more goals.

Descriptive analysis based exclusively on available frequencies.