RadarOnze
PTEN
≡

Flamengo vs Gremio: statistics and analysis

BRASILEIRÃO 2026 · PRE-MATCH ANALYSIS

Brasileirão 2026 · Round 34

· LONDON TIME · Estádio do Maracanã · Referee: not provided

Use the scopes and indicators below to understand both teams’ current form. Statistics provide context, but do not determine the outcome.

Flamengo

Flamengo

1 · 60 pts · 28 P · 18 W · 6 D · 4 L · 55:23 · GD 32

VS
Gremio

Gremio

17 · 29 pts · 28 P · 7 W · 8 D · 13 L · 30:38 · GD -8

Statistical engine · radaronze-v1

RadarOnze analysis

Probabilities calculated in advance. The explanatory layer organises existing factors and does not change the model’s numbers.

View in the Betting Centre

Away team to score 1+ goals

47.7%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Signal consensus: 51.7

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Away team to score 1+ goals has a model probability of 47.7%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.69 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 3.5 yellow cards

71.2%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
27 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — metric: 4.64

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.54 × 2.27

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 70.1

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 27 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 98.2%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected metric: 4.80

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 92.6

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 3.5 yellow cards has a model probability of 71.2%, medium confidence and a sample of 27 matches per team.

League average — metric: 4.64 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.54 × 2.27 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 4.5 yellow cards

52.5%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
27 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — metric: 4.64

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.54 × 2.27

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 70.1

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 27 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 98.2%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected metric: 4.80

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 99.5

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 4.5 yellow cards has a model probability of 52.5%, medium confidence and a sample of 27 matches per team.

League average — metric: 4.64 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.54 × 2.27 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Double chance 1X

89.6%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 62.2

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Double chance 1X has a model probability of 89.6%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.69 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Double chance X2

29.3%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 44.7

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Double chance X2 has a model probability of 29.3%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.69 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 0.5 goals

93.2%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Signal consensus: 99.6

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 0.5 goals has a model probability of 93.2%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — goals: 2.69 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 20.5 shots

93.6%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — shots: 27.98

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 19.81 × 9.07

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 84.4

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected shots: 28.87

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 85.4

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 20.5 shots has a model probability of 93.6%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — shots: 27.98 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 19.81 × 9.07 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Over 6.5 shots on target

78.3%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — shots on target: 9.14

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 6.40 × 2.49

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 77.9

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Model expected shots on target: 8.89

    Count model with home/away adjustment, team strength and empirical smoothing.

  • Signal consensus: 100

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Understand this analysisStructured analysis

Over 6.5 shots on target has a model probability of 78.3%, medium confidence and a sample of 28 matches per team.

League average — shots on target: 9.14 (Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.) Home/away strength: 6.40 × 2.49 (Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.) Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450 (Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.)

No current market price is available for this signal.

The explanation organises results that have already been calculated; it does not change probabilities, odds, edge, EV, confidence or value classification.

Result probabilities — 1X2Complementary statistical view. It does not take part in top signals or tickets.

Away win

10.4%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 62.2

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Draw

18.9%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 82.2

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

Home win

70.7%

medium
View full analysis
Sample
28 matches/team
Model
radaronze-v1

Model factors

  • League average — goals: 2.69

    Weighted average using only matches played before the fixture.

  • Home/away strength: 2.15 × 0.57

    Separate home and away expectations, shrunk towards the overall average.

  • Opponent strength: 1599 × 1450

    Chronological Elo adjustment with no future matches used.

  • Recency: 120-day half-life

    Exponential weighting with a 0.2 floor; older matches never disappear completely.

  • Historical stability: 63.3

    Index derived from the dispersion of previous outcomes for this market.

  • Sample per team: 28 / 28

    Valid home-team and away-team matches available before kick-off.

  • Historical coverage: 100.0%

    Share of previous matches with complete data for this market.

  • Expected Goals: 2.01 × 0.62

    The xG signal receives 28% of the weight; observed goals receive 72%.

  • Model expected goals: 2.11 × 0.58

    Parameters from the independent Poisson model for the home and away teams.

  • Score matrix: 0–10 goals per team

    The 1X2 probabilities are normalised to add up to exactly 100%.

  • Signal consensus: 44.7

    Agreement between the parametric model and the smoothed empirical frequency.

18+ · Statistical estimates, not guaranteed outcomes. Bet responsibly.

Data interpretation

RadarOnze analysis

An original, deterministic reading of the real samples shown on this page.

Across 10 recent matches, Flamengo recorded 7 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat and averaged 2.00 goals scored per match. Gremio's 10-match sample contains 2 wins, 2 draws and 6 defeats, with 1.00 goal scored per match.

The venue split shows Flamengo at home with 10 wins, 3 draws and 1 defeat in 14 matches, averaging 2.00 goals scored and 0.71 goals conceded. Away from home, Gremio has 0 wins, 4 draws and 10 defeats in 14 matches, with 0.57 goals scored and 1.57 goals conceded.

Both teams scored in 6 of 10 matches (60%) of Flamengo's sample and 6 of 10 matches (60%) of Gremio's. Over 2.5 goals occurred in 5 of 10 matches (50%) and 6 of 10 matches (60%), respectively.

Shot volume separates the sides at 17.60 per match for Flamengo and 11.30 for Gremio. On target, the averages are 5.90 and 3.70, respectively.

Historical frequencies describe the available sample; they are not a promise or certainty about a future result.

Form

Recent form and season

Last 5

Flamengo

5 matches
WWWWW
W
5
D
0
L
0
GF
10
GA
2

Last 5

Gremio

5 matches
DLLLW
W
1
D
1
L
3
GF
6
GA
7

Last 10

Flamengo

10 matches
WWWWWLWWDD
W
7
D
2
L
1
GF
20
GA
7

Last 10

Gremio

10 matches
DLLLWLLWDL
W
2
D
2
L
6
GF
10
GA
15

Last 20

Flamengo

20 matches
WWWWWLWWDDWWLDWDWWWW
W
14
D
4
L
2
GF
42
GA
15

Last 20

Gremio

20 matches
DLLLWLLWDLLWDLDWLDDL
W
4
D
6
L
10
GF
17
GA
26

Season

Flamengo

28 matches
WWWWWLWWDDWWLDWDWWWWLDWWWWDL
W
18
D
6
L
4
GF
55
GA
23

Season

Gremio

28 matches
DLLLWLLWDLLWDLDWLDDLLWDDWLWL
W
7
D
8
L
13
GF
30
GA
38

Goals

Frequencies across the last 10

Average goals scored

Flamengo

2.00 · 10 matches

Gremio

1.00 · 10 matches

Average goals conceded

Flamengo

0.70 · 10 matches

Gremio

1.50 · 10 matches

Over 0.5

Flamengo

100% · 10 of 10 matches

Gremio

90% · 9 of 10 matches

Over 1.5

Flamengo

90% · 9 of 10 matches

Gremio

70% · 7 of 10 matches

Over 2.5

Flamengo

50% · 5 of 10 matches

Gremio

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Over 3.5

Flamengo

10% · 1 of 10 matches

Gremio

20% · 2 of 10 matches

Both teams scored

Flamengo

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Gremio

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Clean sheet

Flamengo

40% · 4 of 10 matches

Gremio

10% · 1 of 10 matches

Failed to score

Flamengo

0% · 0 of 10 matches

Gremio

40% · 4 of 10 matches

Corners

Volume and observed lines

Average for

Flamengo

6.70 · 10 matches

Gremio

4.50 · 10 matches

Average against

Flamengo

3.40 · 10 matches

Gremio

6.00 · 10 matches

Total average

Flamengo

10.10 · 10 matches

Gremio

10.50 · 10 matches

Over 7.5

Flamengo

50% · 5 of 10 matches

Gremio

80% · 8 of 10 matches

Over 8.5

Flamengo

40% · 4 of 10 matches

Gremio

70% · 7 of 10 matches

Over 9.5

Flamengo

30% · 3 of 10 matches

Gremio

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Over 10.5

Flamengo

30% · 3 of 10 matches

Gremio

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Over 11.5

Flamengo

30% · 3 of 10 matches

Gremio

40% · 4 of 10 matches

Cards

Averages and frequencies

Team average

Flamengo

1.50 · 10 matches

Gremio

3.20 · 10 matches

Opponent average

Flamengo

2.40 · 10 matches

Gremio

2.60 · 10 matches

Total average

Flamengo

3.90 · 10 matches

Gremio

5.80 · 10 matches

Over 2.5

Flamengo

70% · 7 of 10 matches

Gremio

90% · 9 of 10 matches

Over 3.5

Flamengo

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Gremio

90% · 9 of 10 matches

Over 4.5

Flamengo

30% · 3 of 10 matches

Gremio

80% · 8 of 10 matches

Over 5.5

Flamengo

20% · 2 of 10 matches

Gremio

60% · 6 of 10 matches

Fouls

Match intensity

Committed average

Flamengo

10.50 · 10 matches

Gremio

12.60 · 10 matches

Opponent average

Flamengo

11.60 · 10 matches

Gremio

12.90 · 10 matches

Total average

Flamengo

22.10 · 10 matches

Gremio

25.50 · 10 matches

Shots

Production and concessions

Average shots

Flamengo

17.60 · 10 matches

Gremio

11.30 · 10 matches

Average shots on target

Flamengo

5.90 · 10 matches

Gremio

3.70 · 10 matches

Average shots conceded

Flamengo

11.40 · 10 matches

Gremio

19.10 · 10 matches

Average shots on target conceded

Flamengo

3.10 · 10 matches

Gremio

5.70 · 10 matches

Average xG

Flamengo

1.66 · 6 matches

Gremio

0.79 · 7 matches

Average xG against

Flamengo

0.84 · 6 matches

Gremio

1.84 · 7 matches

Home vs away

Flamengo at home × Gremio away

Flamengo at home

Flamengo

14 matches
WWWWWDWLDWWWWD
W
10
D
3
L
1
GF
28
GA
10

Gremio away

Gremio

14 matches
LLLLLDDLDLLDLL
W
0
D
4
L
10
GF
8
GA
22
Average goals scored

Flamengo at home

2.00 · 14 matches

Gremio away

0.57 · 14 matches

Average goals conceded

Flamengo at home

0.71 · 14 matches

Gremio away

1.57 · 14 matches

Over 0.5

Flamengo at home

100% · 14 of 14 matches

Gremio away

86% · 12 of 14 matches

Over 1.5

Flamengo at home

100% · 14 of 14 matches

Gremio away

71% · 10 of 14 matches

Over 2.5

Flamengo at home

57% · 8 of 14 matches

Gremio away

43% · 6 of 14 matches

Over 3.5

Flamengo at home

14% · 2 of 14 matches

Gremio away

7% · 1 of 14 matches

Both teams scored

Flamengo at home

43% · 6 of 14 matches

Gremio away

50% · 7 of 14 matches

Clean sheet

Flamengo at home

50% · 7 of 14 matches

Gremio away

14% · 2 of 14 matches

Failed to score

Flamengo at home

7% · 1 of 14 matches

Gremio away

50% · 7 of 14 matches

Total corner average

Flamengo at home

10.21 · 14 matches

Gremio away

8.57 · 14 matches

Over 8.5 corners

Flamengo at home

64% · 9 of 14 matches

Gremio away

64% · 9 of 14 matches

Total card average

Flamengo at home

4.57 · 14 matches

Gremio away

5.43 · 14 matches

Players and goalkeepers

Pre-match highlights

Flamengo

Pedro

Forward

7.04

28 matches · 2266 min

16 goals · 5 assists · 35 of 53 shots on target

Samuel Lino

Midfielder

7.34

27 matches · 1809 min

9 goals · 7 assists · 21 of 42 shots on target

J. Carrascal

Midfielder

6.99

22 matches · 1207 min

5 goals · 7 assists · 16 of 27 shots on target

G. de Arrascaeta

Midfielder

6.98

21 matches · 1410 min

3 goals · 4 assists · 13 of 38 shots on target

Lucas Paquetá

Midfielder

7.24

19 matches · 1309 min

5 goals · 0 assists · 13 of 32 shots on target

A. Rossi

Goalkeeper

6.99

28 matches · 2575 min

77 saves · 21 goals conceded

Andrew

Goalkeeper

0.00

4 matches · 0 min

0 saves · 0 goals conceded

Gremio

Carlos Vinícius

Forward

6.87

27 matches · 2149 min

10 goals · 1 assists · 25 of 37 shots on target

C. Pavón

Forward

7.04

25 matches · 1932 min

2 goals · 4 assists · 9 of 13 shots on target

Gustavo Martins

Centre-back

6.62

20 matches · 1604 min

3 goals · 2 assists · 6 of 10 shots on target

F. Amuzu

Forward

6.82

23 matches · 1538 min

1 goals · 3 assists · 9 of 26 shots on target

J. Enamorado

Forward

6.56

23 matches · 1038 min

0 goals · 3 assists · 3 of 13 shots on target

Weverton

Goalkeeper

7.21

26 matches · 2405 min

88 saves · 28 goals conceded

Gabriel Grando

Goalkeeper

1.38

5 matches · 90 min

2 saves · 1 goals conceded

H2H

Recent meetings

Gremio 0 × 1 Flamengo1492255
Average goals
1.00 · 1 match
Both teams scored
0% · 0 of 1 matches
Over 2.5
0% · 0 of 1 matches

H2H corners: 6.00 · 1 match

Combined view

Data convergences

  • Both scopes show a high frequency of the home team scoring.

Descriptive analysis based exclusively on available frequencies.